Showing posts with label 1980s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1980s. Show all posts

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Re-using Ariane first stage - The live test

In mid 1981, ESA approved the funding for a real recovery exercise to be performed in mid 1982 during Ariane 5th or 6th flight. An order for an Ariane interstage 1-2 including the parachute system was placed to Fokker Aerospace in The Netherlands.


Fokker was at that time the prime contractor for the Ariane interstages. The main parachutes were made by Irvin in UK, while Autoflug, Germany, provided the drogue parachutes and control box.
Fokker delivered the special interstage in mid 1982 and the parachute system added an additional 850kg to the launch vehicle.The test was now scheduled to be part of Ariane flight L07.

Unfortunately, in September 1982, the failure of Ariane 5th flight (L05) and loss of its first commercial payload put the program on hold and impacted the launch manifest. Flight L07 was now due to carry an Intelsat V, whose weight precluded carriage of parachutes.
The parachute live test was first postponed to the 11th mission, due mid 1984. This was changed again and the flight of the next Ariane 1 (V-14) was picked instead.

At last

On July 2nd 1985, a recovery barge and a tugboat came all the way from Hamburg, Germany to the recovery zone in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. At the Kourou space center in French Guiana 350kms away, the Ariane 1 rocket rose up into the sky and 149 seconds after launch, the staging operation went as planned and the 1st stage started its free fall toward the recovery ships.
However, the parachutes system did not work out and the 1st stage crashed loudly into the sea. The recovery live test was a failure.
That evening, while cheering to the successful launch of the rocket’s payload, the probe Giotto, ESA announced that a new recovery test will be planned asap.

However, a series of dramatic failures would soon stormed the western space industry during the following months. Two Ariane flights would go wrong in September 1985 (V-15) and in May 1986 (V-18). The Space Shuttle would be grounded after the Challenger disaster in Early 1986 and in April 1986, a Titan 34D would destroyed its launch pad.

Gaining back launcher reliability was now more important than reducing costs for the commercial launch market. So, the second recovery test was scrubbed as the Ariane 4 development programme was winding-up for a maiden flight in 1988.



References :


  • ESA Bulletin nr 39 pp19 - Feb 1982 -
  • FLIGHT International - 17 April 1982 - Fokker makes Ariane a parachute


Images are my personal thought of what could have been the recovery scene. Based on New Scientist - 6 May 1982 - Down to earth rocket

Thursday, January 30, 2014

Re-using Ariane’s first stage - The study

As spaceX is working hard to routinely reuse its Falcon 9 rocket stages, one can remember that 30 years ago, Ariane 1 could have been the very first liquid rocket to have its 1st stage safely recovered and refurbished after every launches.

 From 1979 to 1981, CNES, the french space agency, and ESA made a deep study to use a set of parachutes in order to slow down the first stage's fall into the Atlantic Ocean. Cutting cost on launch operation was seen as critical for Europe at that time. The Space Shuttle was about to make its first flight and this new spacecraft was to slash launch cost. The fear of ESA was that all commercial satellite operators would leave the Ariane order book in favor of the space shuttle one, leaving few governmental flight for the European rocket with pricey launches as a consequences.


Saving costs

Recovering the first stage is attractive from an economic point of view because it accounts for roughly 40 per cent of the cost of an Ariane rocket. The propellant tanks of the stage are made of stainless steel. In 1982, the recovery of the wreckage of the ill-fated fifth flight (L05) showed that those tanks, although bumped, remained corrosion-free after a short stay in sea-water. It was then foreseen that they could be reuse after cleaning with fresh water and refurbished.

The same principle would apply for other parts such as the engine turbopumps and the propulsion bay that might be re-use on later flights. However, engineers foresaw a necessary replacement of the engine nozzles, because they would distort when their hot surface touched the sea. Overall, the saving count indicated that an Ariane launch costs can be cut by roughly 10 to 15%.

Recovery plan

The conclusion of the 1981 studies pointed that a couple of critical phases had to be mastered for a successful recovery :

  • To point and slow down the stage to allow a gentle sea landing. The calculations indicated that a maximum speed of 12,5m/s was needed at landing in order to stay below structural strength of the empty stage and avoid any damages.
  • To find and lift that stage quickly enough to prevent any corrosion by seawater or damages from the waves. 
ESA crafted a detailed recovery plan to overcome those critical phases.

Braking sequence
The first stage of Ariane would separate at an altitude of about 53 km and a velocity of 2100 m/s (7500km/h). lt would continue its coasting flight up to an altitude of 87 km, after which it would fall back into the sea, some 340 kms from the launch site in the Atlantic ocean. As the stage would go through thicker parts of the atmosphere, its speed would decrease and reach 160m/s (ca 600km/h) at 5000 m high. At this height, a mortar would fired two drogue parachutes. These would stabilise the stage and pull out an intermediate parachute of 12,5m diameter. This parachute would first half opened at 2m diameter and its purpose would be to stabilize the oscillations of the falling stage and to make sure it is pointing with the engine bay downward.

The parachute would then fully open and further reduces the speed of the stage down to 70m/s (252 km/h). At 2000m high, the final braking sequence would start with the deployment of four main parachutes of 20m diameter. They would slowly open and lift the stage so that it enters the sea at the required maximum 12,5 m/s speed.

Once in the water, calculations show that the buoyancy of the stage would keep it near vertical with a maximum 5° tilting angle.
However, In some cases, the tank pressure could go down to as low as 0,9 bars and cause damages to the structural integrity of the stage, so it might be necessary to repressurise the tanks in order to ensure that the stage remains afloat after impact. A pressurization system was yet to be defined but could either be part of the rocket or provided by the recovery team at sea level.

Recovery sequence
The recovery ship would track optically the stage as it descends. Four radio beacons fitted in the front interstage will also ease the localization of the booster when floating at sea. As soon as the stage is in view, a tug boat would bring a dedicated recovery barge toward the impact zone. The barge would include a floating sledge nicknamed “the spoon” specially designed to recover the floating stage.

On site, the recovery crew would first secured the stage by checking it for any propellant leaks (Nitrogen tetroxide and UH 25 are highly toxic and should be carefully vented before any human activities) and disabling the flight termination system to prevent any explosion during operations. Divers would then release the spent parachutes and tilt the stage near horizontal with the help of buoyancy bags. The recovery sledge would be positioned under the stage and both would be strongly tied together. Next, a winch would tow the sledge safely onto the barge through a dedicated ramp. At last, the sledge would be safely tied to the barge for the journey back to Cayenne harbour, French Guiana. 

Reusability
Once at land, the recovered stage would be carefully cleaned with fresh water and a neutralising agent would be sprayed onto it. The main components would be disassembled and dried. A first assessment would be done before transporting the parts back to the manufacturing plants scattered in Europe. There, deep analysis will be performed and the parts in good shape will go through the normal validation process before being assembled again on a new stage.

- To be continued -

References : 

  • ESA bulletin nr 25 pp33 - Feb 1981
  • ESA Bulletin nr 39 pp19 - Feb 1982
  • FLIGHT International - 17 April 1982 - Fokker makes Ariane a parachute 


Images are my personal thought of what could have been the recovery scene. Inspired from New Scientist - 6 May 1982 - Down to earth rocket

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Hermes spacecraft - 1979 early draft




I think that the Hermes program, that runs from 1977 to 1993, is one of the longest, most passionate and eventually the most frustrated development of a spacecraft ever started.
There was a lot of hiccups all over this project.
Some technical issues first, that added some weight constantly over the time. It gave challenges to both the airframe and the booster.
Some political fights then between the main fund-raisers of ESA the European space agency in charge of Hermes. The British, the French and the German strongly disagree on the direction to go.
And last, some financial issue that put a stop to the work when the budget over exceeded all initial forecasts and the fundraisers decided to close their wallets.


But let's go back to 1977.
That year while the space shuttle Enterprise underwent its first free atmospheric test flight, CNES, the French space agency initiated a pre-study of a tiny space plane that could carry  European astronauts into orbit.
The plane was to be launched atop an Ariane rocket à la Dyansoar/Titan booster. But while the Ariane 1 was at that time in its final development stage (its maiden flight was in 1979) CNES envisionned a much more powerful launcher variant, the Ariane 5/H, to lift off Hermes.

In 1979, CNES presented a set of blueprints and artist rendering to the press.
The plane was 12,5 meters long with a wingspan of 8 meters and weighted 10 tons. It could carry 5 astronauts or 2 astronauts and a 1,5 tons payload. While much smaller it had a similar double delta wing shape as use on the US space shuttle.


I based my CAD modelling on this 1979 material and tried to imagine what would be that small bird into orbit.


References :

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

multi role recovery capsule - 3 side view

Here is  a composite 3 views of the model in order to depict the overall shape of the capsule.
  • The front part hosts a Common Berthing Mechanism. It includes a large hatch of 127 cms wide that would have allow astronauts to carry large piece cargo to the Freedom station.
  • Beside the hatch, on each side of the capsule are located 2 RCS units in order to steer the spacecraft to and back from the station.
  • The bold red line is the edge of the reentry heatshield that ends the Command Module.
  • The back side of the ship is the service module. It protects the heatshield upto the reentry sequence, durig launch and maneuvers in orbit. But its main purpose in space is to hosts both the electrical production through solar panel and the telecommunication equipment to send data, voice and video back to earth or through relay satellites.
Related topic on cosmiste.com :







Sunday, May 13, 2012

British Aerospace - Multi role recovery Capsule - 1987


In the mid eighties, ESA was to choose a project to give Europe a manned access to space. While the French were pushing to develop the Hermes spaceplane further, the British unveiled a much simpler alternative : The multi-role recovery capsule (MRRC).

British Aerospace made a pre-study for a 7 tons capsule that could carry 4 to 6 persons in orbit. The existing Ariane 4 rocket or some US rockets could be used as the launcher after being man-rated. In BAe’s plan, besides providing Europe with a man access to space, the capsule was envisioned to be also used as a lifeboat for the therefore planned US space station. Unfortunately, despite its versatility, the capsule was dropped by the ESA at the end of 1987 in favor of the ambitious Hermes spaceplane. However, several years later, the Hermes spaceplane will also be cancelled.

I found little information about this project. So I build the 3D model from this single artwork depicting the capsule. 


The capsule includes a Command Module with most probably a Common Berthing Mechanism to dock with the space station Freedom and some RCS thrusters on the top part. Windows and hatch are on the side. On the back is a disposable service module with its solar panel array and the communication antenna. 

References :
  1. Marcus Lindroos - Astronautix - http://www.astronautix.com
  2. BAe proposes manned capsule - FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL, 24 October 1987 - http://flightglobal.com

Aerospatiale STS-2000


Back in the 80s, the future of space exploration seemed to lie in Single Stage to Orbit vehicles. Every design team around the world was working on various reusable spaceplanes in order to achieve SSTO and reach the ultimate dream : get a cheap, reliable and common way to access low earth orbit.

Aerospatiale, a french company that will later merged into EADS, came up with an elegant spaceplane concept study. Known as the Space Transportation System of years 2000 (STS-2000), it included a combination of air-breathing and rocket engines and was able to deliver 7 tons in orbit. The SSTO 73 meters long plane weighted 338 tons when taking-off horizontally.

I made a 3D model of the plane and pasted it over a high altitude pics of the earth.
Below is an original artwork of the plan.

 

References :
  1. STS-2000 SSTO - Astronautix.com
  2. DESMA - Défi Aérospatial Etudiant 2011 - http://www.studentaerospacechallenge.eu
  3. Aerospaceplane technology - GAO - July 1991 - pp39 - http://www.dtic.mil
  4. Earth background credit = http://space.1337arts.com/